The naturalism as he is now represented by analytic philosophers, is always with A consistent criticism. Not only all reality statements, just as also all metatheoretischen, methodologischen and epistemological theses and statements are subject to the criticism, can be wrong and improve if necessary. Emergency only all reality statements, as wave as all metatheoretischen, epistemological and methodological assumptions and allegations acres subject tons criticism, May fuel element wrong and if necessary, improved. Therefore the Dogmatismusvorwurf is groundless against the naturalism. “Therefore, the Dogmatismusvorwurf against the naturalism OF PUR-float. “
Foto: RegierungOnline Photo: Government online
Recent Comments